This post contains Amazon Affiliate links. When you make a purchase through these links, Cult of Pedagogy gets a small percentage of the sale at no extra cost to you.
When I put things out into the world about teaching, I do my best to support those things with research. But honestly, I’ve never felt really secure about it, because I don’t have any formal training in academic research. I have a Bachelor’s degree in secondary education and an M.A. in writing and publishing, so my direct experience with academic research has been mostly self-directed.
Although plenty of people in the education world do have this training, I’m guessing quite a few others—especially K-12 classroom teachers— are in a similar boat to mine: You have a vague understanding of how a peer-reviewed, published piece of research works, but a lot of it is still pretty confusing. It’s like the university folks who study best teaching practices are standing at the edge of a canyon and all the way on the other side are the actual practicing teachers. There should be steady, clear communication between these two groups—lots of good bridges that are easy to access—but so far we only have a few, and far too many of us on the teaching side don’t even know about them.
That’s what this post is for: to teach teachers how to get ahold of research that can inform what you do in your classroom, hopefully in ways that won’t require crazy amounts of time.
My guest, Dr. Kripa Sundar, is an educational psychologist who agreed to help me get better at understanding how to read research. After talking about some of the excellent publications that are out there that already summarize this research for us, she then walks me through how to find the actual research, then shows me how to read a meta-analysis and a sample study.
Because what Dr. Sundar taught me was highly visual, especially the second half, I have produced it as a 6-part series on YouTube. The last three videos, which are the most visual, are embedded below.
Kripa Sundar, PhD
Start with Good Summary Publications
Before you spend a lot of time looking for single, specific studies to answer your research questions, start by making use of all the research summaries that are already out there.
The What Works Clearinghouse, backed by the U.S. Department of Education, offers a fantastic collection of resources to help educators make research-based decisions. Visitors can compare the effectiveness of various practices, and download practice guides that summarize key research findings, sorted by area of interest. This video offers an overview of everything you can find on the site.
American Educator is a free quarterly journal of the American Federation of Teachers, publishing peer-reviewed, research-based articles on a wide range of education-related topics. Each article goes in-depth on a topic like this one on community schools, summarizing and synthesizing relevant research, and offering robust reference lists so readers can follow up on individual studies.
Handbooks like those from Routledge and Cambridge offer overviews of research on hundreds of topics.
Books. Although these may not be the best source for finding an answer to one specific research question, they’ll give you a good foundation in the general practices that are supported by research:
When dealing with any kind of research, Dr. Sundar cautions educators to keep the following caveats in mind:
Research is an ongoing process. “As you collect more data, the evidence can suggest other things,” Sundar explains. “So what once we said, hey, this works, maybe in a decade or five years or 20 years we’re saying, that doesn’t work. That doesn’t discount the value of research in its whole. It’s a mere factor of how education research happens: We work with students who are living beings in real times of changing context. So as we collect data from these folks, they’re going to show us different sets of data.”
Research is done by humans. “There will always be inherent bias,” Sundar says. So always take the results with a grain of salt.
There are no silver bullets. Even if something worked in a study, “it’s going to be in very controlled setting,” Sundar cautions. That doesn’t mean it’s going to work in your context, with your students, so test it out. If it works, add it into your repertoire.
You can find research to support both sides of any argument. “Without methodological training,” Sundar says, “it can be very hard to (tell) is this a good study or a study that I want to be cautious of?” For this reason, she’s a fan of meta-analyses, because they look at many studies all at once.
Where and How to Find Studies
Dr. Sundar recommends three places to look for research:
For people who don’t have a lot of time to research, or those without extensive formal training, Sundar recommends looking for either systematic reviews or meta-analyses, both of which summarize the results of many studies on a particular topic.
What’s the difference? “A systematic review gives you more a thematic analysis of the papers that have been published,” Sundar says. “A meta-analysis is quantitative summary, so we’re trying to say, on average, across all of these studies, how effective is this strategy?” In other words, the systematic review reads more like a book, whereas a meta-analysis actually crunches the numbers across studies.
When reading a study of this kind, she recommends this process:
Start with the abstract. This will give you a general idea of how the study was conducted and its results.
Read the introductory paragraphs to get a sense for what the authors were looking for in their study and to get clear on how they define the terms they’ll use throughout the paper.
Try reading the methodology section. This may be where a lack of formal training starts to hamper your understanding, but it’s worth a shot to at least get a sense for how the study was conducted. For a meta-analysis, you’re looking to see how many studies and how many subjects (people) were included.
Read the discussion at the end. (This may also be called a “conclusion.”) This section summarizes the findings and how the authors are interpreting their results, along with recommendations for practice and future research.
In this video, Sundar shows me how to read a sample meta-analysis:
Although the process for reading an individual study is similar to that of reading a meta-analysis, it can be interesting to see an example. Here Sundar takes me through a single study:
Two Big Takeaways
If you’re a practicing teacher who is dipping your toe into educational research, Sundar has two pieces of general advice that will make the process go more smoothly.
1. Test things out in small doses.
When you come across a research finding that seems promising, test it on a low-stakes lesson in your own classroom. “Don’t experiment with your hardcore lessons,” Sundar says, “try a super small one. Test it out and see how your students respond, and that way you have the lived experience of, does this work in my context or a classroom
2. Go easy on yourself.
“If you take the initiative to start reading a research article,” Sundar says, “and you’re not sure if the interpretation’s right, I wouldn’t self-doubt or kind of beat down on myself at all, even if I didn’t have the research training. It takes prior knowledge to know what they’re talking about, right? Like, the terms, the more you read them, the more familiar you get. The more number of studies you read, you start noticing a pattern, and you’re kind of like, oh, I see what you mean. As an educator, if you pick up an article and you feel like, God, I don’t understand this, I wouldn’t fret about that. Just read what you can.”
You can find Kripa Sundar on her website or by following her on Twitter at @KripaSundar.
Come back for more. Join our mailing list and get weekly tips, tools, and inspiration that will make your teaching more effective and fun. You’ll get access to our members-only library of free downloads, including 20 Ways to Cut Your Grading Time in Half, the e-booklet that has helped thousands of teachers save time on grading. Over 50,000 teachers have already joined—come on in.
